A group of legal experts is urging patent agencies, courts, and policymakers to address the issue of whether generative artificial intelligence (A.I.), like the technology behind the popular ChatGPT chatbot, can be considered inventors. This A.I. seems capable of producing a wide range of outputs, from recipes and vacation plans to computer code and molecules for new drugs, raising the question of whether it can create inventions.
The debate goes beyond philosophical considerations and has implications for innovation and global competitiveness. While some believe A.I. can be credited as inventors, the prevailing belief is that only humans can hold this title. Various legal actions and discussions have taken place, aiming to shed light on the role and legal status of A.I. in invention.
Dr. Ryan Abbott, founder of the Artificial Inventor Project, is leading the charge to seek patent protection for A.I.-generated inventions. He argues that rapidly advancing A.I., capable of producing unscripted results and stepping into the shoes of a person creatively, should be treated differently from traditional tools used in inventions.
Also See: 27+ AI Tools Every Marketer Should Know About
So far, patent authorities in different countries have had mixed responses to the claims made by the Artificial Inventor Project. While some countries have granted patents for A.I.-generated inventions, others have rejected them, reinforcing the idea that only humans can be inventors.
The ongoing discussion and legal battles raise important questions about A.I., invention, and patent protection in the face of ever-evolving technological advancements. As A.I. continues to improve, the question of whether it can be recognized as an inventor will become even more critical.